more results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
HISTORY of Christian Theology

Postmodernism

Postmodernism is an intellectual, cultural, and artistic movement that arose in the mid-twentieth century that questioned modernity’s assumptions and its grand, optimistic worldview.

Postmodern philosophy is continental philosophy’s misunderstood youngest offspring. Postmodern philosophy emerged in the mid-1960s when a few French philosophers questioned modernity’s worldview. They raised suspicion on any narrative which presupposes that it offers an overarching explanation of how the world functions (meta-narrative), such as Aristotle’s geo-centric philosophy, medieval Christianity’s sacramentality, and the rationality of the Modern era. In the mid-1980’s, the original French postmodernist philosophy was commandeered by intellectuals advocating identity politics. These intellectuals appropriated aspects of the original postmodern theory while abandoning its main thesis of incongruity towards any meta-narrative. They created their own new worldview based on Marxist critical theory, which viewed the world as a struggle between the oppressed and the oppressors. This distorted form of postmodernism took on a life of its own, which was embraced by academia.

Currently, professors, students and commentators from all of the humanities and political persuasions profusely cite the early French postmodernists out of context. We will sort out the distinctions between the original postmodern theory and the radical postmodernism that people today generally associate with postmodernism. In order to do this, it is necessary to have a basic understanding of pre-modern and modern meta-narratives.

Pre-modern Worldviews

Prehistoric cultures generally believed that their fate and nature were ultimately controlled by gods, and the human soul continued to exist in some manner after death. As civilizations evolved, many adopted a complex pantheon of gods such as the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians and Vikings. Hinduism and Zoroastrianism arose in the Indus Valley, with each offering a nuanced view of existence. Hinduism was centered around the cycles of existence (life, death and rebirth) where one’s personal essence progressed or devolved based on one’s actions during each succeeding life based on the law of karma. The ultimate goal was to escape the illusion of this material world through reunification with the eternal essence and the disintegration of one’s ego. Zoroastrianism is a monotheistic religion that introduced a dualistic cosmology of good and evil with a strong belief in individualism, free will, and personal accountability with beliefs of an afterlife consisting of a heaven and hell. Eastern cultures typically adopted a form of the Hindu perspective, while Western cultures generally followed Zoroastrianism’s worldview.

Greek culture introduced an increased value for individual excellence, regardless of class distinction. This is seen with the institution of the Olympics where slaves could compete with aristocrats, the increased value of artisans depicting stories on pottery, and the advent of democracy.

Greek philosophy emphasized fulfillment by living a balanced life of reason which was realized by adhering to five cardinal virtues: wisdom, moderation/temperance, bravery, justice and piety. The ancient Greco-Roman cosmology generally consisted of a first principle (the One or the Good), which was the source of everything else, a divine mind which was associated with intelligence and a metaphysical world of forms, and a world soul. They adopted Aristotle’s geocentric system of nature. According to Aristotle’s philosophy, everything has a telos or purpose to which it is attracted based on its innate essence. The universe consisted of a hierarchy based on the weight of four sublunar elements: earth, water, fire and air. Aristotle’s cosmos was a harmonious, interlocking system involving the universe, physics, biology, ethics and the purpose of life. It was a beautiful orderly paradigm and circumscribed everything into one rational system.

Dante, Divine Comedy

Early Christians liked Aristotle’s system and adapted it to their belief in the Trinity and that God imbued matter with a portion of his grace. Thereby, God was intimately involved in the affairs of this mortal world. This perspective formed the basis for a strong belief in God’s providence and sacramentality, which permeated Christendom throughout the Middle Ages. Medieval Europe was a top-down society with the Church and royalty exercising absolute control over society. Pre-modern European culture revolved around Augustine’s sin paradigm. Humans are born in sin and condemned to suffer in hell for eternity except those who receive God’s grace through his sacraments of baptism, the Eucharist, and confession, including the performance of penance. Everything had a religious connotation. Art was religious. Music was religious. Literature was religious, as epitomized by Dante’s Divine Comedy. Even the calendar was religious. All aspects of culture reinforced the meta-narrative of medieval Christianity.

Transition Period

The Renaissance introduced a period of great cultural and economic change emphasizing individualism, secularism, humanism and a revival of classical learning. Art, architecture and literature pursued beauty and accuracy for their own sake.

The free enterprise system began with personal banking in Venice near the start of the Renaissance. As free enterprise replaced feudalism, a middle class of artisans, merchants and traders emerged leading to more urbanization and individual freedom. John Smith’s book, Wealth of Nations, articulated a new world order based on a capitalistic approach to life. This opened up new avenues for entrepreneurs to fund innovations to meet market demands.

The Protestant Reformation created a crisis of authority, setting the stage for the modern era with its turn to increased individual autonomy. Protestants questioned the authority of the traditions that formed the foundation of their medieval society. They questioned the authority of the clergy and the authority of royalty, which eventually led to questions regarding the existence and authority of God. Everything was put on the table and brought before the bar of personal reason to be judged.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561–1626), argued for replacing the deductive worldview approach to study scientific truth with an inductive approach involving careful observation of experiments based on a skeptical methodology and reason. Philosopher René Descartes, and other mathematicians, stressed the need for each step of a scientific experiment to produce a measurable result which could be expressed in mathematical terms. In 1632, Galileo published his book Dialogue on the Two Chief Systems of the World in which he showed that truth established by math and pure logic provided a more solid foundation on which to build one’s understanding of the universe than Church dogma. Galileo combined Descartes’s recommendation with Bacon’s inductive approach to articulate his five-step scientific method, leading to the scientific revolution.

The Modern Age

Modernism was born with Descartes’ radical doubt and came of age during the Enlightenment when reason and science became the standard to determine truth. Roger Bacon and others championed the theory that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience, creating a debate between rationalist and empiricists regarding the nature of truth and reality. Was it based on logic or one’s experience?

Sir Issac Newton showed that the natural world operated according to universal laws. Deism emerged and proclaimed that there was a natural religion inherent in all human beings. This innate religion was subject to the natural laws of the universe which were established by a watchmaker God who was not directly involved in world affairs. But the emotional emptiness of this proposition led to the pietist movement where individuals sought a deeper personal relationship with God.

Adam Smith’s book, The Wealth of Nations, articulated a new world order based on free enterprise. This capitalist system opened up new avenues for entrepreneurs to fund innovations created by science to meet market demands. Locke proposed using the strength of scientific evidence as the criteria to determine all truth. The strength of your belief was proportional to the strength of your evidence to back it up. David Hume had insisted that it would take a miracle to believe a miracle. Reason and its offspring, science, became the arbiters of truth.

The wide spread acceptance of David Hume’s religious skepticism motivated Kant to provide an erudite response. Later Hegel and Schleiermacher each tried to meld reason with experience in their own ways. This approach, however, split the world between fundamental revivalists and the masters of suspicion. Religion versus science became the dichotomy. Science claimed exclusive rights to reason and thereby killed God. With the death of God, the world was cut loose from its Judeo-Christian moorings to drift aimlessly through the chaos of a nihilistic world where there were no absolutes: no absolute truths, no absolute morals, no absolute standards. Everything became relative.

Science and Mechanics 1931This intellectual movement, spurred on by revolutionary scientific discoveries and increased personal freedom, ushered in a new optimistic age where people looked to science and human reason to create a bright future. Modernity replaced the medieval religious worldview with a rational worldview inseparably linked to science. This Modern meta-narrative assumed that truth was absolute, universal and independent of the human mind, similar to Plato’s metaphysical world of forms. The debate about how one was able to obtain objective knowledge of truth continued with reason (logic) and experience competing for first position. Regardless, it was understood that humans could improve their lives by acting rationally in response to the increased amount of truth being discovered. These assumptions led to the Modern worldview that humanity progressed through the discovery of truth and the rational application of this increased knowledge.

This perspective created an optimistic attitude that there were no limits to human achievement. Science and engineers created new products and the free enterprise system provided the capital to produce and bring them to consumers. Western society saw major advancements in all aspects of temporal life: technology, transportation, health, entertainment, individual freedoms and political expression. But, simultaneously, with the rise of this new optimistic consumerism, an epidemic of loneliness and despair emerged. Temporal luxuries did not satisfy the human need for meaning.

There were cracks all along the Modern journey. Miners and factory workers were forgotten and abused segments of society during the industrial revolution. Race disenfranchised others. Pollution damaged personal health and the environment. The sinking of the Titanic sent a shockwave through society: Man was not invincible. The horror and senseless slaughter of World War I disillusioned a generation. World War II, the Holocaust and the nuclear Cold War caused some French intellectuals to question Modernism’s basic assumptions. Modernity had failed to deliver on its promise to produce the ideal society, free from suffering and injustice. These French intellectuals began to articulate a new way of looking at the world referred to as postmodernism.


Titanic sinking

Roots of Postmodernism

The postmodernism began to take root much earlier with Modernism’s radical doubt. These roots expanded with Kant’s realization that the human mind synthesizes its sense impressions and with Hegel’s notion of a societal consciousness. These roots took hold with Marx’s hermeneutics of suspicion which interpreted societal beliefs with skepticism in order to expose their repressed or hidden meanings. When you then look at these societal norms through the lens of Nietzsche’s will to power, postmodernism emerged to question the foundation of every institution and the veracity of historical “truths.” As one scholar observed, “Modern traditions treat the authority of tradition as irrational, and then postmodernism points out that modernity itself is a tradition.” However, postmodernists often fail to realize that postmodernism is a legacy of the modernity they reject and cannot be divorced from it. Despite its claim of originality, postmodernist logic is often based on the modern tradition of skepticism and on philosophical concepts developed during the Enlightenment period, particularly Kantianism. It is also influenced by Hegelianism, the hermeneutics utilized by Marx, and Heidegger’s phenomenology discussed in previous chapters.

Jean Baudrillard – Simulations

Postmodernism is not just a philosophical theory. It is based on observable cultural changes brought on by Modernity’s perspectives and values. Culture informs society of its worldview of reality. This worldview is influenced by art, everyday human interactions as well as intellectual communications. It is how one finds meaning in life and answers its big questions: Who am I? What is life all about? What is true? Where do I find love? What is love? What happens when I die? Etcetera.

The Modern world introduced a new dynamic in how one sees the world: media. Photographs displayed accurate images of people, places and things. War became real to people far from its fronts. Motion pictures introduced a new form of entertainment. The radio connected diverse communities and vast regions together. Magazines and newspapers informed people about current events and fashion. The television brought live news events from around the world into people’s homes. The internet, cellular phones and social media introduced new ways to communicate, stay informed and connect with others. The entertainment industry capitalized on all of these media sources to create altered images of reality for dramatic effect.

The early postmodernist thinker Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007) referred to these images as simulations. Over time, these simulations become ingrained into our culture. Movies and books like Star Wars and Harry Potter have become part of everyday life and influence the evolution of society’s culture. This process continues as these simulations take on a life of their own and become the source for further simulations. Jokes, advertisements, everyday dialog and even intellectual conversations reference these simulations, adding layer upon layer of simulations removing one further and further from the reality of the natural world. This media explosion creates an overload of contradicting images of reality making it difficult for individuals to decern what is “fake news” and what is real. No longer is there one grand overarching cultural narrative reinforcing established societal views and values.

To a great extent, we each create our own reality based on which images and messages we choose to watch and hear. It is as if we each are living in our own version of the animated movie Bolt. In this movie, a small dog is the hero of a TV series, which he thinks is real. Consequently, people are living in a multitude of diverse realities of their own creation. Humans are social creatures, so various sub-cultures have emerged as individual gravitate to groups of likeminded individuals who reinforce each other’s worldview. This creates the scenario where people unknowingly choose to plug into an alternative reality, like in the movie Matrix. Notice how these references (simulation) to fictional movies help communicate a message about reality. On a macro level, there is a great divide between a rural perspective and the urban worldview. Often a rural conservative believes his views are more grounded in reality than a detached urbanite. But all groups fall victim to group think and confirmation bias, which distorts actual reality to some extent.

This cultural, artistic dynamic led one commentator to observe, “Postmodernism refers to the state of culture where media is produced in such staggering quantities that it has erased the boundaries of reality itself and hyper-reality prevails.”1

Jean-François Lyotard - Incredulity Toward Meta-narratives

Jean Francois LyotardIn his seminal work The Postmodern Condition, Jean-François Lyotard (1924-1998) defined postmodernism “as incredulity toward meta-narratives” because they are unverifiable and easily subject to manipulation by powerful institutional forces.2 Generally, non-philosophers mistakenly think meta-narratives refers to language or metaphysical concepts. It actually refers to any worldview which presupposes that it offers the foundation on which all things, including the concept of truth and wisdom, rests, such as Aristotle’s harmonious geocentric system, Christendom’s sin paradigm, and Modernity’s rationality.

Lyotard brought the term postmodern to the forefront of philosophical debate. Postmodernists generally question the objectivity and accuracy of modernity’s depiction of the world and typically believe that the foundations of entrenched perspectives are corrupted by existing systems of power. It rejects the notion that any particular historical narrative provides an adequate foundation to understand humanity’s vast cultural experiences.

Lyotard postulated that the developed world had moved past the modern age because we are using a different system to obtain and value knowledge. He argued that with the advent of the computer age, society’s priority moved from training minds to optimizing performance through the use of machines, such as the computer. The rational Modern meta-narrative to legitimize knowledge had been replaced by an emphasis on technological advances controlling access to knowledge. The scientific method to discover and verify knowledge based on logic no longer ruled supreme. “The game is not truth, but efficiency.”3 A few gatekeepers controlled access to this information. This compartmentalization of knowledge led to the dissolution of Modernity’s epistemic system. The disintegration of the narrative (the big story) approach for people to understand reality resulted in the loss of meaning in postmodernity. People now create their own language games to understand truth which celebrates the ever-changing relationships among diverse people.4

Michel Foucault -Power Networks

At the time of his premature death, Michel Foucault (1929-1984) was the most prominent intellectual in France. He researched and traced the formation and function of ideas through history. His work analyzed the historical interrelationships between sociology, psychology, and philosophy. He produced several significant works, but his most influential hypothesis is an understanding of power outlined in three pages of the first volume of his History of Sexuality. Its original title was Will to Knowledge, which was a take-off from Nietzsche’s Will to Power. This original title was appropriate due to the central role power played in his treatise.

Foucault claimed that traditional political theories have not kept up with societal changes and are stuck in an outdated monarchical, top-down perspective. They imagine power as something an individual can possess and organized like a pyramid with one person on top controlling others through sanctions against prohibited activity. He observed that power does not function that way, and we need “to cut off the head of the king” in order to see clearly how power actually functions in society. He claimed that power in not essentially repressive but productive. It does not primarily operate by prohibiting action but it produces the way we experience life.

We should not try to look for the center or power but focus on how it is spread throughout society through diverse intersecting social networks. Primarily, power is not something a person has but rather what people do. It is relational. Power is ubiquitous with all social networks, so we all are both subject to the exercise of power and the wielders of power, and wherever there is power there is resistance. Society functions in a complex dance to music that these unstable networks make on their own. Societal power has its own rationality, objectives and means which largely operate irrespective of the structures imposed by government and institutions.5

Jacques Derrida - Deconstruction

Foucault’s student, Jacques Derrida (1930-2004), became one of Foucault’s most influential antagonists. Derrida was one of the few philosophers to reach star status. His influence spread far beyond philosophy covering literary criticism, art, architectural theory, political theory, and Western culture itself. This vast influence primarily grew out of his theory of deconstruction, which upended philosophical assumptions back to Plato.

Even though his term deconstruction largely defies definition, it basically is an analysis of texts to expose and challenge hidden binary contrasts which undergird our Western hierarchical way of thinking. Recall Descartes epiphany when he realized everything that he learned at the university was built on a sandy foundation and would not stand the test of time. He recognized the need to tear down the whole structure in order to build a new one with a solid foundation. For Derrida, the sand in this metaphor was metaphysics, which went back to Plato. At its heart, Derrida’s philosophy is a critique of Plato’s dualism, substance and forms. He argued that metaphysics creates dualistic oppositions which installs hierarchy and privilege.

His deconstructive strategy involved two steps of identifying hierarchies and reversing them. The first step involves a detailed analysis of texts to identify words that point to an alternative or opposite meaning, such as essence and appearance. n Platonism, essence is more important than appearance. Derrida reverses it. He points out that knowledge of essence depends on our experience with something that appears. He shows that essence can be reduced down to immanence where essence is found in various appearances involving memory and anticipation. Thus, the “inferior” term (appearance) must be re-inscribed as the original superior resource from which essence was derived. He continues that appearance has its own ambiguities based on slight overlaps between memories, presence and anticipation. Thus, our present observation is contaminated by the past and future, creating doubt, or what Derrida refers to as something that is undecidable, thereby destabilizing the original dualistic decision which instituted a hierarchy.6 Derrida’s promoted his deconstruction strategy to provoke us to consider that which is wholly other in order to open our minds to alternative possibilities.

Derrida applied his deconstruction approach to various disciplines, including ethics, justice and political theory. He advocated an approach to ethics based on his Jewish tradition of responsibility to the other, instead of behavior that is rationally justified on general principles. He stressed the absolute personal responsibility to care for others. He addressed the paradox of the correctness of unconditional openness and hospitality where everyone should welcome anyone into their home and the practical dangers involved with this ethical approach to life.7

The Influence of Postmodernism on Culture

These postmodern thinkers did not create postmodernism, but commented on the cultural shift occurring around them. The populus was becoming disillusioned with the optimistic promises of Modernity. Something was not working. Confidence in the institutions of authority waned while shared values disintegrated. These original postmodern philosophers shined a light on various deficiencies of the optimistic Modern worldview. Their criticism was directed more to the intellectual underpinnings of the Modern meta-narrative than to existing social conditions. They challenged modernity’s reliance on reason and personal experience as the exclusive means to understanding reality. These visionaries gave a voice to the sentiments which large segments of society were feeling.8

As demonstrated by the Renaissance, art leads the charge during shifts in societal attitudes and values. The intimate tie between art and emotion provides an accurate means to take the pulse of a society. It is easy to see a world falling apart in Modern and Postmodern art. Near the end of the nineteenth century, artists began to challenge the notion that art should serve as a pure, accurate and transcendent expression of reality. Visual art began to break the rules and challenge the accepted norms. This trend of experimentation continued well into the twentieth century when a new twist arose. Some artists reveled in their attack on high art and traditional values by using everyday objects, appropriation with distortion, irony, and images of pop culture. Pastiche (paste multiple elements together) and collage with unique features became popular. These features were often used with new and mixed media to emphasize a message about social issues.

This same trend was seen in architecture. The traditional Modern style around the turn of the century gave way to simplification and an emphasis in utility. But by the twenty-first century some architecture celebrated the abnormal, complexity, and ornamentation.

Literature was no different. Some writers rejected standard conventions and adopted stylistic methods to overtly challenge accepted practices. They often used paradox, fragmentation, convoluted plots, parody and dark humor to highlight the illogic of a cultural issue being addressed.

Postmodernism’s complex, multifaceted expression through the arts was echoed in the way many people looked at the world. Tradition was not just questioned: it was subject to suspicion and open hostility. Even the assumption that the scientific method was the best framework to understand reality was questioned due to the potential biases of its researchers and human fallibility. They rejected the idea of universal objective truth discovered through science and reason in favor of subjective lived experience. The concept that all historical roles were mere social constructs took hold and diversity was celebrated. Roles and categories had changed over time, so they were fluid. Individuals no longer needed to comply with archaic structures. People were now free to seek happiness however they wanted. Total free expression became a basic human right and tolerance became the ultimate good.

Postmodernism’s challenge to modernity’s reliance on reason and antagonism towards traditional beliefs and institutions aligned postmodernism with the hermeneutics of suspicion, critical theory, multiculturalism, and to a great extent with post-structural literary theory which maintains that language is incapable of directly connecting individuals with reality.

Radical Postmodernism

The original French postmodern philosophers were Marxist or on the political left, so it was natural that far left intellectuals in America would adopt postmodern philosophy to support their political aims. Many of them espoused the Frankford School’s Marxist critical theory that our social and economic life consists of a battle between the oppressed and the oppressor. These intellectuals ignored postmodernism’s unifying principle of incredulity toward meta-narratives and created their own new grand narrative to conform with their political views aligned with identity politics. They then weaponized postmodern philosophy to undermine the existing order by proclaiming the need to deconstruct knowledge and institutions to discover all the hidden baked-in dynamics that sustain the oppressive world. Postmodernism’s original vision of toleration of a plurality of views was turned on its head to become a tool of a divisive, suspicious worldview intent on dismantling the white-patriarchy power-structure to create a new egalitarian utopia.

Bell HooksSome of the intellectuals leading this charge were: Bell Hooks, who wrote extensively about race, feminism, capitalism and gender; Judith Butler, who proposed the theory of gender performativity (individuals choose to perform a role); Kimberle Crenshaw, who introduced and developed the theory of intersectionality (the interrelationship between oppressed groups); and Robin DiAngelo, who wrote about white defensiveness and claimed that children develop attitudes of white supremacy as young as three years of age.

This new “postmodern” meta-narrative proclaiming social relations are based on social constructs, which have historically been controlled by a white patriarchy to subvert the rest of society, has taken hold and dominates academia today. Identity politics has removed individuality out of individualism. Critical theory has made great inroads into western culture leading to institutionalized DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) policies being imposed to benefit marginalized segments of society. This has created a strong, opposing, political reaction. The clash between the traditional Modern ideals and this new postmodern worldview is shaping up to be the primary conflict of our age.

Critique of Postmodernism

The original postmodern philosophers generally questioned the viability of establishing objective truth and morals in favor of plurality in all aspects of existence. This led critics of continental philosophy to falsely accuse them of not believing in objective facts, instead of their skepticism of one’s ability to accurately determine facts. They referred to these philosophers pejoratively as postmodernists and claimed that they were epistemological and moral nihilist who believed that everything was relative. However, that criticism was misplaced. The original French postmodern philosophers simply tried to point out ways people were deceiving themselves due to this overload of simulated images and entrenched cultural prejudices.9 Lyotard stated that philosophers do not claim to know things but simply ask questions. He stated that he “makes no claim to [his hypothesis] being original or even true,” and that it “should not be accorded predictive value in relation to reality.”10

These postmodernists were more like commentators than evangelists for a new meta-narrative. They were not trying to turn the world upside down, but were encouraging people to be more open minded and to see aspects of the world that they had been blind to due to the simplicity of the lens of Modernity’s worldview. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s observation regarding Lyotard applies to all of these early French postmodern philosophers:

“Lyotard offers not an ‘anything goes’ relativism, but rather takes up the historical fact that after the Shoah [Holocaust], there is no longer a belief in the progress of history, à la G. W. F. Hegel (and even more so today, when polls all over the West show that many believe the next generation will be worse off than the last) while there is also what Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) called a general ‘loss of authority’ in traditional institutions. Hence both progressive and conservative political views are found flailing in diagnosing the problems of the political, especially when facing the devaluation of all values in consumer culture.”

However, these criticisms largely apply to the political “postmodern” movement, which has adopted critical theory’s meta-narrative that societal ills are the result of the power struggle between the oppressed and the oppressors, and that the solution is to dismantle the white patriarchy in order to create a new egalitarian utopia. This is the type of simplistic view against which the original postmodern thinkers warned us. Individuals should be able to see the flaws of the modern, secular, consumer-driven worldview without swallowing the ideology of a new meta-narrative which proponents evangelize with religious fervor. This aspect of “postmodern” thought is criticized for its overlap with structuralism and its reliance on linguistic models to understand reality while ignoring the natural world. Sociologist Daniel Bell maintains that radical elements have dominated mass media and used it to proclaim their cultural superiority, while they tear down boundaries without replacing them with any stable form linked to social and political values or first principles.11

Humans inherently construct the lens through which they view the world in order to create some semblance of order and meaning, i.e. a meta-narrative. When a culture does not provide such a lens based on collective values and first principles, the meta-narrative that individuals create are more likely to be fundamentally flawed leading to greater discord and disintegration of civil society. Society does not need to throw rationality out simply because modernity did not fulfill its implicit promise to provide individuals with a sense of meaning and purpose in life.

go to previous article:

Twentieth Century Philosophy

go to next article:

Resurgence of Spiritualism

Additional Resources

on Amazon:

The Lessons of History

The Lessons of History

by Will and Ariel Durant

A concise survey of the culture and civilization of mankind, The Lessons of History is the result of a lifetime of research from Pulitzer Prize–winning historians Will and Ariel Durant. With their accessible compendium of philosophy and social progress, the Durants take us on a journey through history, exploring the possibilities and limitations of humanity over time. Juxtaposing the great lives, ideas, and accomplishments with cycles of war and conquest, the Durants reveal the towering themes of history and give meaning to our own.

Critical Theory

Critical Theory: A Very Short Introduction

by Stephen Eric Bronner

Critical theory emerged in the 1920s from the work of the Frankfurt School, the circle of German-Jewish academics who sought to diagnose -- and, if at all possible, cure -- the ills of society, particularly fascism and capitalism. In this book, Stephen Eric Bronner provides sketches of leading representatives of the critical tradition (such as George Lukács and Ernst Bloch, Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse and Jurgen Habermas) as well as many of its seminal texts and empirical investigations. This Very Short Introduction sheds light on the cluster of concepts and themes that set critical theory apart from its more traditional philosophical competitors. Bronner explains and discusses concepts such as method and agency, alienation and reification, the culture industry and repressive tolerance, non-identity and utopia. He argues for the introduction of new categories and perspectives for illuminating the obstacles to progressive change and focusing upon hidden transformative possibilities. In this newly updated second edition, Bronner targets new academic interests, broadens his argument, and adapts it to a global society amid the resurgence of right-wing politics and neo-fascist movements.

Book, The Human Quest for Meaning
 

What if the greatest crisis of our time wasn’t political, economic, or even scientific, but spiritual? The Human Quest for Meaning, presents an unflinching, scholarly, and soul-searching excavation of humanity’s deepest longings. This work cuts through the fog of postmodern relativism and the sterile worship of science to confront the core dilemma of our time: why does a civilization without God still hunger for transcendence? Drawing from ethnological studies, ancient texts, and forgotten philosophical wisdom, Hallstrom traces the arc of religious and philosophical history; not to convert, but to clarify. In a world obsessed with novelty, this book dares to remember.

In this book, readers will delve into the surprising belief systems of some of the most primitive cultures, exploring why they revered a moral Supreme Being contrary to modern theories of religious evolution. The text also revisits the foundations of Christianity, not as dogma, but as a cultural and metaphysical force that shaped the Western mind. The book further explores how modern secularism has gradually replaced meaning with a mechanistic worldview and why this replacement is now collapsing. It presents concise, accessible summaries of major world religions, from Hinduism and Buddhism to Islam, Sikhism, Taoism, and Zoroastrianism to help broaden a reader’s global spiritual literacy.

In the face of cultural amnesia, this work offers clarity and equips readers with the tools to forge their own enduring philosophy of life. Hallstrom writes with scholarly rigor but aims for accessibility, avoiding dry academic jargon while still delivering a serious intellectual exploration that reads smoothly like a story. While books on religion and philosophy are not new, Hallstrom brings a refreshingly countercultural lens.

Whether you’re a skeptic, a seeker, or a believer, The Human Quest for Meaning will challenge your assumptions, deepen your worldview, and perhaps even awaken something within you.

Available in hardback, audio, paperback and e‑book.

The Conflict of Interpretations, Ricoeur

The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics

by Paul Ricoeur

This collection brings together twenty-two essays by Paul Ricoeur under the topics of structuralism, psychoanalysis, hermeneutics, and religion. In dramatic conciseness, the essays illuminate the work of one of the leading philosophers of the day. Those interested in Ricoeur's development of the philosophy of language will find rich and suggestive reading. But the diversity of essays also speaks beyond the confines of philosophy to linguists, theologians, psychologists, and psychoanalysts.

Figuring the Sacred

Figuring the Sacred

by Paul Ricoeur

The thought of Paul Ricoeur continues its profound effect on theology, religious studies, and biblical interpretation. Introduced by Mark Wallace, the twenty-one papers collected in this volume-some familiar, many translated here for the first time-constitute the most comprehensive anthology of Ricoeur's writings in religion since 1970. The writings are thematically divided into five parts: the study of religion, philosophers of religion, the Bible and genre, theological overtures, practical theology. Ricoeur's hermeneutical orientation and his deep sensitivity to the mystery and power of religious language offer fresh insight into the transformative potential of sacred literature, including the Bible.

Simulacra and Simulation

Simulacra and Simulation (The Body, In Theory: Histories Of Cultural Materialism)

by Jean Baudrillard

This foundational work in postmodern philosophy and cultural theory explores how contemporary society has replaced reality and meaning with symbols and signs, leading to a condition Baudrillard calls “hyperreality.” In his provocative treatise, Baudrillard examines the implications of a world where simulations (copies without originals) precede and shape what we consider real, blurring the boundary between reality and representation. Through analysis of mass media, consumer culture, and technological influence, he argues that modern life is dominated by “simulacra,” images and concepts that no longer refer to any authentic reality but instead reference each other, creating an endless cycle of signification detached from truth. With references ranging from Disneyland to the news media, this book offers a challenging critique of how people in the late twentieth century and beyond perceive, construct, and interact with the world, underlining the instability of meaning in a media-saturated culture.

The Postmodern Condition

The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge

by Jean-Francois Lyotard

Many definitions of postmodernism focus on its nature as the aftermath of the modern industrial age when technology developed dynamically. In The Postmodern Condition Jean-Francois Lyotard extends that analysis to postmodernism by looking at the status of science, technology, and the arts, the significance of technocracy, and the way the flow of information and knowledge are controlled in the Western world. Lyotard emphasized language; the world of postmodern knowledge can be represented as a game of language where speaking is participation in the game whose goal is the creation of new and ever-changing social linkages.

The Inhuman

The Inhuman: Reflections on Time

by Jean-Francois Lyotard

Jean-François Lyotard is one of Europe’s leading philosophers, well known for his work The Postmodern Condition. In this important new study he develops his analysis of the phenomenon of postmodernity. In a wide-ranging discussion the author examines the philosophy of Kant, Heidegger, Adorno, and Derrida and looks at the works of modernist and postmodernist artists such as Cézanne, Debussy, and Boulez. Lyotard addresses issues such as time and memory, the sublime and the avant-garde, and the relationship between aesthetics and politics. Throughout his discussion he considers the close but problematic links between modernity, progress, and humanity, and the transition to postmodernity. Lyotard claims that it is the task of literature, philosophy, and the arts, to bear witness to and explain this difficult transition. This important contribution to aesthetic and philosophical debates will be of great interest to students in philosophy, literary, and cultural theory and politics.

The Order of Things

The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences

by Michel Foucault

With vast erudition, Foucault cuts across disciplines and reaches back into seventeenth century to show how classical systems of knowledge, which linked all of nature within a great chain of being and analogies between the stars in the heavens and the features in a human face, gave way to the modern sciences of biology, philology, and political economy. The result is nothing less than an archaeology of the sciences that unearths old patterns of meaning and reveals the shocking arbitrariness of our received truths. In the work that established him as the most important French thinker since Sartre, Michel Foucault offers startling evidence that “man”—man as a subject of scientific knowledge—is at best a recent invention, the result of a fundamental mutation in our culture.

Madness and Civilization

Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason

by Michel Foucault

Michel Foucault examines the archeology of madness in the West from 1500 to 1800 – from the late Middle Ages, when insanity was still considered part of everyday life and fools and lunatics walked the streets freely, to the time when such people began to be considered a threat, asylums were first built, and walls were erected between the “insane” and the rest of humanity.

Discipline and Punish

Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison

by Michel Foucault

A brilliant work from the most influential philosopher since Sartre. In this indispensable work, a brilliant thinker suggests that such vaunted reforms as the abolition of torture and the emergence of the modern penitentiary have merely shifted the focus of punishment from the prisoner’s body to his soul.

Writing and Difference

Writing and Difference

by Jacques Derrida

First published in 1967, Writing and Difference, a collection of Jacques Derrida’s essays written between 1959 and 1966, has become a landmark of contemporary French thought. In it we find Derrida at work on his systematic deconstruction of Western metaphysics. The book’s first half, which includes the celebrated essay on Descartes and Foucault, shows the development of Derrida’s method of deconstruction. In these essays, Derrida demonstrates the traditional nature of some purportedly nontraditional currents of modern thought—one of his main targets being the way in which “structuralism” unwittingly repeats metaphysical concepts in its use of linguistic models.
The second half of the book contains some of Derrida’s most compelling analyses of why and how metaphysical thinking must exclude writing from its conception of language, finally showing metaphysics to be constituted by this exclusion. These essays on Artaud, Freud, Bataille, Hegel, and Lévi-Strauss have served as introductions to Derrida’s notions of writing and différence—the untranslatable formulation of a nonmetaphysical “concept” that does not exclude writing—for almost a generation of students of literature, philosophy, and psychoanalysis.
Writing and Difference reveals the unacknowledged program that makes thought itself possible. In analyzing the contradictions inherent in this program, Derrida foes on to develop new ways of thinking, reading, and writing,—new ways based on the most complete and rigorous understanding of the old ways. Scholars and students from all disciplines will find Writing and Difference an excellent introduction to perhaps the most challenging of contemporary French thinkers—challenging because Derrida questions thought as we know it.

Of Grammatology

Of Grammatology

by Jacques Derrida

This book is about a revolutionary approach to phenomenology, psychoanalysis, structuralism, linguistics, and indeed the entire European tradition of philosophy that changed the face of criticism. The deconstruction bombshell that rocked the Anglophone world. Jacques Derrida’s revolutionary approach to phenomenology, psychoanalysis, structuralism, linguistics, and indeed the entire European tradition of philosophy―called deconstruction―changed the face of criticism. It provoked a questioning of philosophy, literature, and the human sciences that these disciplines would have previously considered improper. Forty years after Of Grammatology first appeared in English, Derrida still ignites controversy, thanks in part to Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s careful translation, which attempted to capture the richness and complexity of the original. This fortieth anniversary edition, where a mature Spivak retranslates with greater awareness of Derrida’s legacy, also includes a new afterword by her which supplements her influential original preface. Judith Butler has added an introduction. All references in the work have been updated. One of contemporary criticism’s most indispensable works, Of Grammatology is made even more accessible and usable by this new release.

All About Love

All About Love: New Visions

by bell hooks

Part of: Love Song to the Nation (3 books)
A New York Times bestseller and enduring classic, All About Love is the acclaimed first volume in feminist icon bell hooks’ “Love Song to the Nation” trilogy. All About Love reveals what causes a polarized society, and how to heal the divisions that cause suffering. Here is the truth about love, and inspiration to help us instill caring, compassion, and strength in our homes, schools, and workplaces. “The word ‘love’ is most often defined as a noun, yet we would all love better if we used it as a verb,” writes bell hooks as she comes out fighting and on fire in All About Love. Provocative and intensely personal, renowned scholar, cultural critic and feminist bell hooks offers a proactive new ethic for a society stricken with lovelessness—not the lack of romance, but the lack of care, compassion, and unity. People are divided, she declares, by society’s failure to provide a model for learning to love. In this landmark book, bell hooks explores the question “What is love?” Her answers strike at both the mind and heart. Disputing that the ideal love is infused with sex and desire, she provides a new path to love that is sacred, redemptive, and healing for individuals and for a nation. All About Love is a powerful, timely affirmation of just how profoundly love and community can change hearts and minds for the better.

Gender Trouble

Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity

by Judith Butler

One of the most talked-about scholarly works of the past fifty years, Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble is as celebrated as it is controversial. Arguing that traditional feminism is wrong to look to a natural, ‘essential’ notion of the female, or indeed of sex or gender, Butler starts by questioning the category ‘woman’ and continues in this vein with examinations of ‘the masculine’ and ‘the feminine’. Best known however, but also most often misinterpreted, is Butler’s concept of gender as a reiterated social performance rather than the expression of a prior reality. Thrilling and provocative, few other academic works have roused passions to the same extent.

Critical Race Theory

Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement

by Kimberle Crenshaw

What is Critical Race Theory and why is it under fire from the political right? This foundational essay collection, which defines key terms and includes case studies, is the essential work to understand the intellectual movement. Why did the president of the United States, in the midst of a pandemic and an economic crisis, take it upon himself to attack Critical Race Theory? Perhaps Donald Trump appreciated the power of this groundbreaking intellectual movement to change the world. In recent years, Critical Race Theory has vaulted out of the academy and into courtrooms, newsrooms, and onto the streets. And no wonder: as intersectionality theorist Kimberlé Crenshaw recently told Time magazine, “It’s an approach to grappling with a history of white supremacy that rejects the belief that what’s in the past is in the past, and that the laws and systems that grow from that past are detached from it.” The panicked denunciations from the right notwithstanding, CRT has changed the way millions of people interpret our troubled world. Edited by its principal founders and leading theoreticians, Critical Race Theory was the first book to gather the movement’s most important essays. This groundbreaking book includes contributions from scholars including Derrick Bell, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Patricia Williams, Dorothy Roberts, Lani Guinier, Duncan Kennedy, and many others. It is essential reading in an age of acute racial injustice.

Nice Racism

Nice Racism: How Progressive White People Perpetuate Racial Harm

by Dr. Robin DiAngelo

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER
Building on the groundwork laid in the New York Times bestseller White Fragility, Robin DiAngelo explores how a culture of niceness inadvertently promotes racism. In White Fragility, Robin DiAngelo explained how racism is a system into which all white people are socialized and challenged the belief that racism is a simple matter of good people versus bad. DiAngelo also made a provocative claim: white progressives cause the most daily harm to people of color. In Nice Racism, her follow-up work, she explains how they do so. Drawing on her background as a sociologist and over 25 years working as an anti-racist educator, she picks up where White Fragility left off and moves the conversation forward. Writing directly to white people as a white person, DiAngelo identifies many common white racial patterns and breaks down how well-intentioned white people unknowingly perpetuate racial harm. These patterns include: -rushing to prove that we are “not racist”; -downplaying white advantage; -romanticizing Black, Indigenous and other peoples of color (BIPOC); -pretending white segregation “just happens”; -expecting BIPOC people to teach us about racism; -carefulness; -and feeling immobilized by shame.
DiAngelo explains how spiritual white progressives seeking community by co-opting Indigenous and other groups’ rituals create separation, not connection. She challenges the ideology of individualism and explains why it is OK to generalize about white people, and she demonstrates how white people who experience other oppressions still benefit from systemic racism. Writing candidly about her own missteps and struggles, she models a path forward, encouraging white readers to continually face their complicity and embrace courage, lifelong commitment, and accountability. Nice Racism is an essential work for any white person who recognizes the existence of systemic racism and white supremacy and wants to take steps to align their values with their actual practice. BIPOC readers may also find the “insiders” perspective useful for navigating whiteness.

The Cultural Contradictions Of Capitalism

The Cultural Contradictions Of Capitalism

by Daniel Bell

Insightful prediction of a knowledge-based society driven by services, technology, and the rising role of women. With a new afterword by the author, this classic analysis of Western liberal capitalist society contends that capitalism and the culture it creates harbors the seeds of its own downfall by creating a need among successful people for personal gratification a need that corrodes the work ethic that led to their success in the first place. With the end of the Cold War and the emergence of a new world order, this provocative manifesto is more relevant than ever.

1 Postmodernism explained for beginners! Jean Baudrillard Simulacra and Hyperreality explained, The Media Insider, 2022.

2 Lyotard, Jean François, The Postmodern Condition, 1979, translated 1984.

3 Dorothea E. Olkowski, University of Colorado, Postmodernism, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

4 Lyotard, Jean François, The Postmodern Condition, 1979, translated 1984; Gary Aylesworth, Postmodernism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023; Peter Gratton, Jean françois Lyotard, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023.

5 Gary Gutting and Johanna Oksala, Michel Foucault, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024; Mark Kelly, Michel Foucault, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

6 Leonard Lawlor, Jacques Derrida, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024; Jack Reynolds, Jacques Derrida, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

7 Leonard Lawlor, Jacques Derrida, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024.

8 Leonard Lawlor, Jacques Derrida, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024.

9 Douglas Keller, Jean Baudrillard, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023; Dorothea E. Olkowski, University of Colorado, Postmodernism, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

10 Lyotard, J.F., 1984 [1979], The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Geoff Benington and Brian Massumi (trans), Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

11 Bell, Daniel, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, New York: Basic Books, 1976, pgs, 45,50, 51.

IMAGES:

Dante Alighieri with Florence and the Realms of the Divine Comedy (Hell, Purgatory, Paradise), Domenico di Michelino, 1465, Florence Cathedral, Gallery of the dome. [CC 3.0]

Everyday Science and Mechanics, November 1931 issue, illustrated by Frank R. Paul, [PD-US]

Titanic sinking, by Willy Stöwer, 1912, [PD-US]

Jean-Francois Lyotard photographed by Bracha Ettinger, 1955, [CC 2.0]

Bell Hooks, 2009, [PD]

ClearStone Publishing hopes that this site will assist you in your quest for truth and your desire to connect with God.

 

Please share if you found this post informative.